33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives from the police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair on the offender plus the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

The main objectives of police would be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all be certain law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

In that perception, case law differs from a person jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Big apple would not be decided using case legislation from California. Instead, The big apple courts will review the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions around the issue exist, Ny courts could possibly check out precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority relatively than binding authority. Other factors like how old the decision is plus the closeness for the facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common regulation.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.

13. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is recognized and also the employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the various penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct is not really ample although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful way. Read more

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

PLR is actually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

If you find an error from the content of a published opinion (like a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

10. Without touching the merits in the case in the issue of once-a-year increases while in the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment for being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of your police is usually to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police here officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Although the pair had two youthful children of their very own at home, the social worker didn't notify them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report into the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had young children.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.

States also commonly have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, like family legislation and probate. Case legislation, also known as precedent or common regulation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending within the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case legislation can be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) just isn't strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by just one district court in Big apple is not really binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning may help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more